Kierkegaard Got It Right

Soren Kierkegaard, sometimes called “the Father of Existentialism,” was a philosopher who attempted to appeal to both secular and religious readers.  Kierkegaard was the only philosopher who got it right.

Born on May 5, 1813, in Copenhagen, Denmark, Kierkegaard was never politically correct.  He typically was not sensitive to others.  He was not liked by Scandinavians or, for that matter, by anybody else.  He believed in God, but Catholics, Protestants, and other believers turned against him.  He was an existentialist, but other existentialist philosophers spurned his writings.  Yet, Kierkegaard got it right.

It is like the story of a judge who made a ruling that neither the plaintiff nor the defendant liked.  The judge smiled and said, “Well, since nobody likes my ruling, that means I made the right decision.”

Kierkegaard champions our individual freedom in making choices over the religious or secular establishment’s restrictions on your decisions.  Your unification with God will not be assisted by a priest or minister or policeman or government employee.  It will be a one-on-one meeting of the minds.  You will become one with God only within yourself.

Your attendance at church and your giving to the church will carry no value into the afterlife.  You will carry nothing on this journey of death except what is within you.  And according to Kierkegaard, God must be your guide on this road, otherwise you will be lost.

Kierkegaard had two primary steps.  First, know yourself.  If you know yourself, you will be a strong individual who can resist the temptations of life.  Second, know God.  Only God has experienced everything and can assist you through the chaos of the afterlife.

It is important to know yourself inwardly and subjectively.  Know your weaknesses.  Pride must become humility.  Be independent, but humble in your individualism.  The highest goal in subjective ethics is to be humble.

Then let God inside your subjective self, thus allowing an objective spirit to enter your body.  This creates the synergy of subjective and objective reasoning.  The combination of a priori and a posteriori makes for perfection.

Once you let God enter your soul, your independent spirit will be lifted up to new heights.  This combination completes the person.  God’s objective, empirical knowledge is the final piece that finishes the jig-saw puzzle.  The highest goal in objective ethics is to become one with God.

Subjective consequences for your poor choices in life will be handed out by your conscience, but objective consequences will be administered by your Creator.

 

 

Idiot-Proofing Morality

What is moral?  Who determines immorality?  Unfortunately, idiot extremists typically control what is deemed to be both moral and immoral.  Both conservatives and liberals determine what is right and wrong based on their extreme beliefs.

The majority of society generally falls in either the category of being apathetic or following the extremist views like sheep.  Hitler, representing the right, and Stalin, representing the left, are examples of extremist leaders who took over their respective countries.  Hitler and Stalin executed thousands and thousands of people in the name of morality, which was dictated by them.

Fundamentalist religious leaders and liberal communist workers are very similar in how they operate.  Just like with Hitler and Stalin, extremist leaders will end up in the same zone, imposing a perverted moral code, either right or left, on society.

So, how do you idiot-proof morality?  How do you keep the idiot extremists from taking over and imposing their deluded values on the rest of the world? Would it surprise you if I told you nobody has been able to do it yet?

And even if we eliminated the extremists, would the remaining population know what was moral?  Would it be an objective test based on what a reasonable person thought?  Or would it be a subjective test based on what you believed to be moral?

Neither test is very effective.  I have never met a person who was reasonable under any and all circumstances.  But I have met many scary people who didn’t care about anything or anybody, so their subjective test would be worthless.

Even though these are rather negative conclusions about the determination of morality, I still think that most of us have an idea what is right and wrong.  Most of us feel guilty when we do something that is bad.  Those psychopaths who have no feelings of shame during life may face consequences in the afterlife.

So, the bottom line is that we either die and nothing happens, or we meet our creator who, more than likely, will provide consequences for our choices.  Death leading to nothing is not the typical ending in our recycling universe.   Also, life makes no sense if we have free will to make choices and there are no consequences.  It would make life quite absurd.